Trade-Related Court Cases Filed for Week of Nov. 10-16
The following lawsuits were filed at the Court of International Trade during the week of Nov. 10-16:
Sign up for a free preview to unlock the rest of this article
Export Compliance Daily combines U.S. export control news, foreign border import regulation and policy developments into a single daily information service that reliably informs its trade professional readers about important current issues affecting their operations.
Evonik Rexim (Nanning) Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., a foreign exporter, challenging the Commerce Department's final results of the 2012-13 administrative review on glycine from China. #14-00296. Summons filed Nov. 12.
Fedmet Resources Corporation challenging CBP's decision to require single transaction bonds on entries of magnesia carbon bricks from Vietnam that CBP said may be subject to antidumping and countervailing duties on magnesia carbon bricks from China. #14-00297. Complaint filed Nov. 12.
Delphi Automotive Systems challenging a Commerce Department scope ruling that found its aluminum heater core tubes are subject to antidumping and countervailing duties on aluminum extrusions from China (see 1410200062">1410200062). #14-00298. Complaint filed Nov. 13.
Incase Design Corp. challenging CBP's denial of its protests on the classification of an origami workstation. CBP classified the merchandise under subheading 4202.92.9060 (17.6%). Incase says it should have instead been classified under subheadings 4820.30.0000 or 4820.90.0000 (both free), and 8473.30.5100 (free), 3926.10.0000 (5.3%) or 3926.90.9980 (5.3%). #14-00299. Summons filed Nov. 13.
AK Steel, Allegheny Ludlum, and United Steelworkers challenging the International Trade Commission's negative injury determination from the antidumping duty investigations on grain-oriented electrical steel from China, the Czech Republic, South Korea and Russia. #14-00300. Complaint filed Nov. 13.
Lifestyle Enterprise challenging CBP's assessment of antidumping duties on an entry of wooden bedroom furniture from China. Lifestyle says it was not the importer of record on the shipment, but a customs broker used Lifestyle's importer of record number on the entry without power of attorney. #14-00301. Summons filed Nov. 14.
Hoosier Stamping & Mfg. Corp. challenging CBP's denial of its protests on the classification of lawn mower tires. CBP classified the merchandise under subheading 4011.99.8500 (3.4%). Hoosier says it should have instead been classified under subheading 4011.92.0000 (free) or 9817.00.6000 (free). #14-00302 Summons filed Nov. 14.
G.G. Marck & Associates challenging CBP's denial of its protests on the classification of ceramic mugs and cups. CBP classified the merchandise under subheadings 6912.00.44 (10%) and 6912.00.48 (9.8%). G.G. Marck says they should have instead been classified under subheading 6912.00.39 (4.5%). #14-00303 Summons filed Nov. 14.
Appeals of CIT Decisions
No appeals of Court of International Trade decisions were filed at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit during the week of Nov. 10-16.