Oral Argument in Court Challenge of FCC Incentive Auction Could Be Heard in March
Oral argument in the court challenge against the FCC incentive auction order by NAB and Sinclair could be heard as early as March, said the briefing schedule released by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit Thursday. Final…
Sign up for a free preview to unlock the rest of this article
Export Compliance Daily combines U.S. export control news, foreign border import regulation and policy developments into a single daily information service that reliably informs its trade professional readers about important current issues affecting their operations.
briefs are due Jan. 27, and oral argument is typically heard at least 45 days after the last briefs are filed, the order said. In an expedited case such as this one, oral argument is typically heard very soon after the final brief, an attorney experienced in such matters told us. The court’s schedule is very close to the one requested by all three parties to the case in a joint filing (see 1410060045), designed to allow the case to wrap up before the mid-2015 incentive auction. NAB and Sinclair asked to brief their cases separately, since their objections are focused on different sections of the auction order. NAB raised issues about the commission’s use of updated OET-69 software, while Sinclair argued that the FCC violated the law by requiring displaced licensees to cease operating on their old channels within 39 months of the auction even if their replacement facilities aren’t usable. The D.C. Circuit said petitioners will file their briefs jointly, limiting the amount of space each argument will have. Their initial brief is due Nov. 7.