Rewrite Communications Act and Leave 'Very Skinny FCC,' Litan Recommends
In rewriting the Communications Act, “I would have a very skinny FCC,” said Robert Litan, a Brookings Institution nonresident senior fellow, speaking Wednesday at a Brookings Institution event in Washington on the Communications Act. Litan backs a “very minimalist role”…
Sign up for a free preview to unlock the rest of this article
Export Compliance Daily combines U.S. export control news, foreign border import regulation and policy developments into a single daily information service that reliably informs its trade professional readers about important current issues affecting their operations.
for the agency, focused on its management of spectrum auctions and “I would have them administratively stop discrimination,” whether on the Internet or in traditional media spaces involving network owners blocking content, he said. Robert McDowell, a former Republican FCC commissioner and now partner at Wiley Rein, cautioned about the ease with which the FCC can escape “its congressional tether” and become “oligarchical,” citing the role of the courts in reining the agency in when needed. Litan, a former principal deputy assistant attorney general in the Justice Department’s antitrust division, scoffed at the FCC’s role in approving acquisition deals and said it should be nixed. Larry Irving, a former NTIA administrator and now consultant to telecom and information technology clients, resisted what he viewed as any “straight economic test” or one simply focused on consumer harm, calling communications the “lifeblood of a democracy.” They debated over how prominent the public interest component of the FCC’s role should be, with McDowell cautioning over a potentially “expansive” interpretation. “A straight economic test would frighten me,” Irving said. But the public interest standard should be clearer, he said, noting past challenges in finding the right balance. “It’s impossible,” McDowell said, cautioning against ex ante regulation and noting how much has changed even in the past decade. Irving referred to the many pieces of the FCC puzzle and said “the Communications Act gets most of them right.” But Irving would work to fix certain shortcomings at the agency, he said, referring to a need for expediency on certain fronts. He called efforts to clear federal spectrum “abysmal.” Litan predicted multiple possible drivers of a Communications Act overhaul on Capitol Hill, positing that net neutrality advocates could end up unhappy with the FCC’s rulemaking and ultimately go to Congress seeking a “fix” of the act. Alternatively, Republicans could take control of the Senate, Litan posited: “Imagine a scenario in which they win the presidency in 2016,” Litan said. “Maybe that becomes something the Republicans push because there’s no one to veto.”