FMC Lists New Shipping Act Agreements

July 30, 2013 by Tim Warren|Transport

The Federal Maritime Commission released a notice of the filing of the following agreements under the Shipping Act of 1984. Interested parties may submit comments on the agreement to the Secretary, Federal Maritime Commission, Washington, DC 20573, within 10 days.

Sign up for a free preview to unlock the rest of this article

Export Compliance Daily combines U.S. export control news, foreign border import regulation and policy developments into a single daily information service that reliably informs its trade professional readers about important current issues affecting their operations.

Start My Free Preview

012064-002. Hapag-Lloyd/NYK Mexico-Dominican Republic Slot Exchange Agreement. Parties: Hapag-Lloyd AG and Nippon Yusen Kaisha. Filing Party: Wayne Rohde, Cozen O’Connor; 1627 I Street, NW; Suite 1100; Washington, DC 20006. The amendment would increase the amount of space to be exchanged under the agreement and add authority for Hapag-Lloyd to charter space to NYK on a service string not previously covered by the agreement. The amendment would also delete obsolete language and clarify language in the agreement.
012214. Glovis/K-Line Space Charter Agreement. Parties: Hyundai Glovis Co., and Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha. Filing Party: John Meade, General Counsel; K- Line America, 6009 Bethlehem Road; Preston, MD 21655. The agreement authorizes the parties to charter space to each other in the trade between South Korea on the one hand, and the U.S. East Coast and U.S. West Coast, on the other hand.
201217-001. Port of Long Beach Data Services Agreement. Port of Long Beach, PierPass Inc., Long Beach Container Terminal, SSA Terminals, SSA Terminal (Long Beach), LLC; International Transportation Service, Pacific Maritime Services, and Total Terminals. Filing Party: David Smith, Cozen O’Connor; 1627 I Street, NW, Suite 1100; Washington, DC 20006-4007. The amendment would extend the agreement term and adjust the compensation provided for in the agreement. The amendment would also clarify the name of one of the parties to the agreement. The parties have requested expedited review.

(Federal Register 07/31/13)