A data aggregation company failed to show sufficient evidence of...
A data aggregation company failed to show sufficient evidence of discriminatory treatment to justify a court’s grant of a preliminary injunction against Comcast, the 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled Wednesday (http://xrl.us/bnriij). The case involved directory assistance data, provided…
Sign up for a free preview to unlock the rest of this article
Export Compliance Daily combines U.S. export control news, foreign border import regulation and policy developments into a single daily information service that reliably informs its trade professional readers about important current issues affecting their operations.
to third-party aggregators and used for directory-related services. Comcast signed an agreement with the aggregator LSSi in 2007, but terminated the arrangement four years later, and said it would provide access to its data only through a new company, Targus. LSSi filed suit, alleging Comcast’s new arrangement was discriminatory under certain nondiscrimination provisions of the Communications Act -- Sections 202, 222(e) and 251(b)(3). The district court granted a preliminary injunction to LSSi, finding a “substantial likelihood of success” on the merits of its claim. But the 11th Circuit said the decision was an abuse of discretion: LSSi did not show it was likely to succeed, because it had not yet shown substantial evidence of discriminatory treatment. “Asking what we understand to be the correct question -- whether Comcast through its agent Targus will discriminate between itself and LSSi -- we conclude that LSSi has not shown a substantial likelihood of success on the merits,” the appeals court wrote. The “potential” for unlawful discrimination is present, but further discovery is necessary to determine that, the court wrote.