AD: China Certain Cased Pencils
(a) For previously reviewed or investigated companies not listed above, that have separate rates, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the company-specific rate published for the most recent period.
Sign up for a free preview to unlock the rest of this article
Export Compliance Daily combines U.S. export control news, foreign border import regulation and policy developments into a single daily information service that reliably informs its trade professional readers about important current issues affecting their operations.
| China First Pencil Company, Ltd./Three Star Stationery Industry Corp. | 15.20% |
| Orient International Holding Shanghai Foreign Trade Co., Ltd. | 10.96% |
| Shandong Rongxin Import & Export Company Ltd. (formerly called Kaiyuan Group Corporation) | 27.87% |
| All others | (a)(b)(c) |
(b) The cash deposit rate for all other China exporters will be 114.90%, the current China-wide rate.
(c) The cash deposit rate for non-China exporters will be the rate applicable to the China supplier of that exporter.
Assessment Instructions for the Review Period (12/01/01 - 11/30/02)
According to the ITA, it will determine and U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) will assess, AD duties on all entries of subject merchandise in accordance with these final results of review.
For the companies subject to this review, the ITA states that it has calculated exporter-specific assessment rates because there is no information on the record that identifies the importers of record.
The ITA also states that it will issue appropriate assessment instructions directly to CBP within 15 days of May 21, 2004.
(See ITA notice for more information, including the scope of the order and the rescission of one company from this review. See ITT's Online Archives or 01/22/04 news, 04012240 for BP summary of the preliminary results of this AD duty administrative review.)
| ITA Contact - | Paul Stolz | (202) 482-4474 |
ITA notice (FR Pub 05/21/04) available at http://a257.g.akamaitech.net/7/257/2422/14mar20010800/edocket.access.gpo.gov/2004/pdf/04-11575.pdf
BP Note
BP's summary of the preliminary results of this AD duty administrative review erroneously stated that the China-wide rate "includes companies subject to this review that did qualify for separate a rate." This statement is inappropriate and contains editorial errors. As a result, it should be removed from the preliminary results notice. (ITT's Online Archives will be corrected accordingly.)